9-11: Why the US-Government was involved

Here is another subject. 9-11 is credited to Osama Bin Laden, who denied to be involved at all for the first week and then gave in to the pressure of his families friends and accepted the guilt for this attack. At first he welcomed the attack and regretted publicly that he was not involved. Then, all of a sudden, he said that he did it. Strange? High Military officers reported that they were ordered to let him escape several times. Why? Because all he is guilty of is to protect the real Terrorists. And our Government does not want a public statement with this truth.
Another interesting fact: Most of the foreign insurgents are from Saudi Arabia, not from IRAN. The Government calls them just "AL Qaeda" and insinuates via television that they come from IRAN, the next target that the Republicans and some spineless Democrats have for a war. Actually for World War III, as publicly announced by George W. Bush, because the rest of the world is standing against this Madman who is leading the US in this second unnecessary and absolutely insane war. Like Hitler did with Germany some 60 years ago.

But wait, there is more. The Book "THE NEW PEARL HARBOR" by Professor David Ray Griffin (who has been Professor of Philosophy of Religion at the Claremont School of Theology in California for 30 years and is author and editor of more than 20 books) shows the backgrounds and reasons for 9-11. And why our government is most likely involved in the attack. Here an addendum he added for the second edition, called "40 smoking guns". This book should be read by everyone who has an IQ which enables them to vote for someone other than George W. Bush. They should also watch the movie: "Loose Change 911, 2nd edition" (click this link to watch it for free!)

David Ray Griffin – The New Pearl Harbor

40 Smoking Guns

I have often been asked whether there are any "smoking guns” Pointing to complicity by the Bush administration. This is a question I did not explicitly address in the body of the book. Rather than focusing on those reported events that most strongly suggest such complicity presented a cumulative argument, suggesting that what is most persuasive, assuming the truth of at least a significant portion of the reported evidence, is that so many lines of evidence all seem to point in the same direction….Because this question has come up so often, I will conclude with a list of the reported items that I would so classify. In going back through the book to assemble this list, I was surprised to see how many there are.

1. The failure of standard operating procedures (SOP) to intercept Flight 11.

2. The failure of SOP to intercept Flight 175.

3. The failure of SOP to intercept Flight 77.

4. The fact that the official story as to these failures changed a few days after 9/11.

5. The fact that according to the second version of the official story, the order to scramble jet fighters to intercept Flights 11 and 175 went to Otis Air Force base instead of the nearer base, McGuire.

6. The fact that according to this second version, the order to scramble jet fighters to protect Washington went to Langley Air Force base instead of the nearer base, Andrews.

7. The fact that, even given NORAD'S timeline and the greater distances the pilots had to cover from Otis and Langley, their fighter jets, flying at full speed, should have reached New York and Washington in time to prevent the attacks on the South Tower and the Pentagon.

8. The fact that according to this second version, the fighter jets that were too late to intercept Flights 11 and 175 were not ordered to continue on to Washington, even though it was then known that Flight 77 had bee hijacked and, according to the official story, was headed back toward Washington.

9. Secretary of Transportation Mineta's report of a conversation that may have reflected a stand-down order by Vice President Cheney.

10. The fact that in New York on 9/11, three steel-framed hi buildings, for the first time in history, collapsed because of fires – quite localized fires at that, especially in the South Tower and Building 7.

11. The fact that the South Tower fell first even though, according to the hypothesis that the buildings collapsed because of fire, this tower, having been hit second and having the smaller fire, should not have collapsed first.

12. The multiple types of physical evidence that the Twin Towers and Building 7 collapsed by means of controlled demolition. (Because there are many types of such evidence- - such as the fact that the steel beams and columns were broken into pieces the right size to be loaded onto trucks - this point could have been divided into many smoking guns.)

13. Larry Silverstein's statement that he and the fire department decided to "pull" WTC-7, combined with the evidence that the fire department had prior knowledge of its collapse, despite the lack of any physical evidence indicating imminent collapse.

14. Mayor Giuliani's statement that he knew in advance that the Twin Towers were going to collapse.

15. The quick removal of the steel from all three buildings - especially Building 7, where there would have been no victims - before it could be examined.

16. The fact that photographic evidence shows that the hole created in the Pentagon was much smaller than a hole created by a Boeing 757 would be.

17. The fact that photographs show that there were no remains of a large airliner in front of the crash site, even though, given the small entrance hole, not all of a Boeing 757 could have gone inside.

18. The fact that witnesses also reported seeing no remains of a airliner inside the Pentagon.

19. The fact that the west wing, far from being the most likely part of the Pentagon for terrorists to target, was the least likely, as well as technically difficult to hit.

20. The fact that any non-military plane, not having a transponder sending out a "friendly" signal, would have been automatically shot down by the Pentagon's battery of missiles.

21. The extreme unlikelihood that a hijacked 757 could have flown undetected through American airspace, especially toward the Pentagon, for some 40 minutes.

22. The evidence that the Bush administration lied about not having shot down Flight 93.

23. The fact that President Bush gave the impression upon his arrival at the Sarasota school, even after a telephone conversation with Condoleezza Rice, that he was unaware that two more airliners, beyond the one that had crashed into the North Tower of the WTC, had been hijacked.

24. The fact that Bush, after being told about the attack on the South Tower, did not act like a commander in chief who was surprised to learn that the United States was suffering the greatest terrorist attack in its history.

25. The fact that Bush and his entourage, including his Secret Service detail, showed no sign of fear that they would be attacked while in Florida, even though at that time they-assuming the truth of the official account-would have known neither how many planes had been hijacked nor what the terrorists' targets were.

26. The multiple denial by Bush administration officials that they had had any idea that planes might be used as weapons in a Terrorist attack against the United States, even though such knowledge was widespread – partly because of warnings the Bush administration itself that terrorists were in fact planning such attacks.

27. The fact that the FBI must have had specific advance knowledge of the attacks, given (a) its confiscation of a film of the attack on the Pentagon within five minutes, (b) its confiscation of student files from Florida flight schools within 18 hours, and (c) the reported testimony of FBI agents (to David Schippers and the New American) That they knew the dates and targets of the New York attacks months in advance.

28. The repeated denial by Bush administration officials that they had received any specific advance knowledge about the attacks of 9/11, contradicting strong evidence to the contrary, including that provided by the purchases of enormous amounts of put options on United Airlines, American Airlines, and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.

29. The evidence that although Osama bin Laden was officially America's "most wanted" criminal, he was treated by an American surgeon and visited by a CIA agent in an American hospital in Dubai two months prior to 9/11.

30. The evidence that local FBI agents in Minnesota, New York, and Chicago were prevented by FBI headquarters from carrying out investigations that could have uncovered the plot.

31. The harassment and demotion of DIA agent Julie Sirrs after she brought back information about a plan in Afghanistan to assassinate Ahmad Massood.

32. The evidence that the Bush administration had already determined by July of 2001 that it would attack Afghanistan "by the middle of October at the latest," combined with the fact that the attacks of 9/11, by occurring on that date, gave the US military sufficient preparation time to begin its assault on October 7.

33. The evidence that during the "Hunt for Bin Laden" after 9/11, he and his Al Qaeda forces were repeatedly allowed to escape.

34. The evidence that the Bush administration sought in multiple ways to conceal the connections between 9/11 and Pakistan's ISI.

35. The fact that the FBI, the Justice Department, and the Air Force all refused to answer questions about the report that many of the (alleged) hijackers had received training at US flight schools.

36. The multiple reasons to doubt the official conspiracy theory's tale of Arab-Muslim hijackers.

37. The firing and subsequent gagging of FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds after she reported that a 9/11-related investigation was being sabotaged by a spy.

38. The fact that while people such as Julie Sirrs and Sibel Edmonds have been punished, there have been no reports of punishment for anyone who acted incompetently or obstructively in relation to 9/11 whether in the FAA, the FBI, the CIA, the DIA, the NSA, the Justice Department, the White House, NORAD, the Pentagon, or the US military more generally.

39. The fact that the Bush administration has not revealed the identities of those who purchased the put options on United Airlines, American Airlines, and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.

40. The fact that the White House repeatedly obstructed the attempts of the 9/ 11 Commission-as feeble as they appear to have been-to learn how the attacks of 9/11 could have succeeded.
These smoking guns could provide some starting points for a real investigation-if and when one is ever authorized.

These “40 Smoking Guns” were taken from the book “The New Pearl Harbor” by David Ray Griffin, that everybody who believes in a terrorist attack on the US should read.

Amen

PS. And if you want to know even more verifiable facts, click here

Bush and Cheney are looking for a new war

Who will be the victim this time? Russia or IRAN?

The war in IRAQ is almost over, now the Republicans and Big Money behind the scenes are trying to have the US-Military occupy the country for the next 50 years. So, to keep the Billions and the blood flowing, Big Money in the US needs new wars that can not be stopped that easily. So they are having Bush and Cheney looking for new opportunities for bloodshed and more Billions before they either declare a state of emergency after they lose the next elections or actually have to step down (June 6, 2007).CNN. U.S. President George W. Bush risked escalating a rumbling row with Russia over U.S. plans for a Europe-based missile defense system by warning that democratic reforms in Russia had been "derailed." In an earlier press conference, Bush said Moscow had nothing to fear from U.S. missile shield plans, which would see bases placed in European countries once within the Kremlin's sphere of influence including the Czech Republic and Poland. "Russia's not our enemy," Bush said, adding that the defense shield was meant to target "rogue nations," not escalate a new Cold War standoff. "My message will be, Vladimir - I call him Vladimir - that you shouldn't fear a missile defense system," Bush said. "As a matter of fact, why don't you cooperate with us ... Please send your generals over to see how such a system would work. Send your scientists. Let us have the ability to discuss this issue in an open forum."

Putin has said the deployment threatens Russian territory and will "turn Europe into a powder keg and stuff it with new types of weapons." The Kremlin leader raised the stakes over the weekend, warning that he may aim nuclear weapons at European targets unless Washington abandons its plans. "If this does not happen, then we will withdraw any responsibility for our retaliatory measures because it wasn't us who initiated a new round of arms race development in Europe," Putin said.

Imagine that Russia would set up a missile shield against the US in Canada. Would we stand idly by? The US started the IRAQ war for financial reasons and with this the US have become the muggers of the modern world - we ignore Global warming for financial reasons for the benefit of the richest and they also need a new war to sell weapons and keep the Gas prices high. Why does anyone believe we would not start a second war? This article will be in the archives for later review and my desperate call: I told you so, why don't you listen, why don't you look for yourself?

It is amazing that everything in current US politics is so predictable and transparent, and that hardly anybody sees it. The Oil Industry got the first gift from the Bush/Cheney Corporation that sold out America and is still cashing in with Gas prices that are higher than double of what would be economically realistic and morally acceptable. Ordered by their other commanders in weapons Industry, war suppliers and the contractors, who cashed in but are still not satisfied with the Billions their two puppets handed them so far, Bush and Cheney have been looking for a new war since a while.

Vladimir Putin was smart enough to ignore Cheney's verbal attacks when Cheney visited Lithuania several month ago. So the first attempt to start a war with Russia had failed. Now the second attempt is to set up Rockets which threaten Russia. And this might be a challenge which the Russian President Putin might not be able to fend off that easily - purely in the interest of his people and possible public opinion. And to make it impossible for Putin to react otherwise, Bush and his partners in crime published the new Rocket threat for Eastern Europe as widely as they could. The other possible next victim of US aggression is IRAN whose President claims to use the nuclear facilities for peaceful purposes. The only country who has been starting wars recently and is funding a bloody occupation is the US. How would you call a country that would attack the US, occupy us, randomly kick in doors at night and search your house? And how would you call the people who do this in Los Angeles, New York, Dallas and Washington D.C.?

Liberators or Terrorists?
Even though Scooter Libby was sentenced to only 30 months in jail for selling out a covert member of the CIA, his commander Dick Cheney should be on trial. This is a crime of high treason and the question is why the traitors are not in Guantanamo Bay being interrogated exactly as they requested by law and court-martialed according to the severity of their crime.

In a related story: The Democratic Party ignored and still ignores the will of the American people and disappointed in every aspect so far.

Habeas Corpus, which means that our government has to explain why it's holding a person in custody, has been taken away by Bush and his crime family under the false pretenses of terrorism. The only terrorism this, our country has seen so far was government ordered. Financed by the United Arab Emirates and carried out by some of their men and most of the terrorist came from Saudi Arabia, the President Bush's closest (and only) friends.

As a 'thank you' he tried to give the United Arab Emirates the control over our most important ports. This was stopped by a public outcry not to give our ports to the terrorists. But back to habeas corpus: the reinstating of this and other essential civil rights for all American citizens should have been the first action of the Democrats during their first 100 hours of power. Another missed opportunity for the opportunists.