Bush and Cheney are looking for a new war

Who will be the victim this time? Russia or IRAN?

The war in IRAQ is almost over, now the Republicans and Big Money behind the scenes are trying to have the US-Military occupy the country for the next 50 years. So, to keep the Billions and the blood flowing, Big Money in the US needs new wars that can not be stopped that easily. So they are having Bush and Cheney looking for new opportunities for bloodshed and more Billions before they either declare a state of emergency after they lose the next elections or actually have to step down (June 6, 2007).CNN. U.S. President George W. Bush risked escalating a rumbling row with Russia over U.S. plans for a Europe-based missile defense system by warning that democratic reforms in Russia had been "derailed." In an earlier press conference, Bush said Moscow had nothing to fear from U.S. missile shield plans, which would see bases placed in European countries once within the Kremlin's sphere of influence including the Czech Republic and Poland. "Russia's not our enemy," Bush said, adding that the defense shield was meant to target "rogue nations," not escalate a new Cold War standoff. "My message will be, Vladimir - I call him Vladimir - that you shouldn't fear a missile defense system," Bush said. "As a matter of fact, why don't you cooperate with us ... Please send your generals over to see how such a system would work. Send your scientists. Let us have the ability to discuss this issue in an open forum."

Putin has said the deployment threatens Russian territory and will "turn Europe into a powder keg and stuff it with new types of weapons." The Kremlin leader raised the stakes over the weekend, warning that he may aim nuclear weapons at European targets unless Washington abandons its plans. "If this does not happen, then we will withdraw any responsibility for our retaliatory measures because it wasn't us who initiated a new round of arms race development in Europe," Putin said.

Imagine that Russia would set up a missile shield against the US in Canada. Would we stand idly by? The US started the IRAQ war for financial reasons and with this the US have become the muggers of the modern world - we ignore Global warming for financial reasons for the benefit of the richest and they also need a new war to sell weapons and keep the Gas prices high. Why does anyone believe we would not start a second war? This article will be in the archives for later review and my desperate call: I told you so, why don't you listen, why don't you look for yourself?

It is amazing that everything in current US politics is so predictable and transparent, and that hardly anybody sees it. The Oil Industry got the first gift from the Bush/Cheney Corporation that sold out America and is still cashing in with Gas prices that are higher than double of what would be economically realistic and morally acceptable. Ordered by their other commanders in weapons Industry, war suppliers and the contractors, who cashed in but are still not satisfied with the Billions their two puppets handed them so far, Bush and Cheney have been looking for a new war since a while.

Vladimir Putin was smart enough to ignore Cheney's verbal attacks when Cheney visited Lithuania several month ago. So the first attempt to start a war with Russia had failed. Now the second attempt is to set up Rockets which threaten Russia. And this might be a challenge which the Russian President Putin might not be able to fend off that easily - purely in the interest of his people and possible public opinion. And to make it impossible for Putin to react otherwise, Bush and his partners in crime published the new Rocket threat for Eastern Europe as widely as they could. The other possible next victim of US aggression is IRAN whose President claims to use the nuclear facilities for peaceful purposes. The only country who has been starting wars recently and is funding a bloody occupation is the US. How would you call a country that would attack the US, occupy us, randomly kick in doors at night and search your house? And how would you call the people who do this in Los Angeles, New York, Dallas and Washington D.C.?

Liberators or Terrorists?
Even though Scooter Libby was sentenced to only 30 months in jail for selling out a covert member of the CIA, his commander Dick Cheney should be on trial. This is a crime of high treason and the question is why the traitors are not in Guantanamo Bay being interrogated exactly as they requested by law and court-martialed according to the severity of their crime.

In a related story: The Democratic Party ignored and still ignores the will of the American people and disappointed in every aspect so far.

Habeas Corpus, which means that our government has to explain why it's holding a person in custody, has been taken away by Bush and his crime family under the false pretenses of terrorism. The only terrorism this, our country has seen so far was government ordered. Financed by the United Arab Emirates and carried out by some of their men and most of the terrorist came from Saudi Arabia, the President Bush's closest (and only) friends.

As a 'thank you' he tried to give the United Arab Emirates the control over our most important ports. This was stopped by a public outcry not to give our ports to the terrorists. But back to habeas corpus: the reinstating of this and other essential civil rights for all American citizens should have been the first action of the Democrats during their first 100 hours of power. Another missed opportunity for the opportunists.